Step 4: Final Bridge Type

Step 4: AAT (Area Advisory Team), BSMT (Bi-State Management Team), RAC (Regional Advisory Committee)

Final Bridge Type Alternatives

During Step 4 of the process, three final alternatives were selected from the six offered in Step 3. These alternatives were further analyzed and presented to the Executive Bridge Type Selection Committee for final review. The committee chose the Three-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge Type for the Downtown Bridge and the Median-Tower Cable-Stayed Center Cables Bridge Type for the East End Bridge.

View Final Bridge Types
Downtown Bridge
East End Bridge

View Bridge Type Alternatives
Downtown Bridge
East End Bridge

Step Four of the Bridge Type Selection Process entailed narrowing the list of alternatives to three final bridge types. The design teams developed a comprehensive assessment of each of the final bridge types and presented all of the input received from the advisory teams and the public to the Executive Bridge Selection Committee, made up of representatives from Indiana and Kentucky. The Executive Bridge Type Selection Committee decided on the final bridge type at each location based on the assessments from the design teams and considerable public input on the three final bridge types for both the Downtown and East End Bridges.

The design of the final bridge type alternatives was coordinated with the adjacent approach sections to ensure smooth transitions to the new interchanges on each side of the river. Cost estimates for each alternative were carefully reviewed and finalized, and preliminary Coast Guard approval of details such as pier location for each alternative were obtained.

There were advisory team meetings in this step to inform the members of the recommended list of bridge type alternatives and to solicit feedback. All of the information developed through the four-step Bridge Type Selection Process and all of the input received from the advisory teams and the public was presented to the Executive Bridge Type Selection Committee for its consideration in selecting the final bridge types.

Both states were committed to the principles of Context Sensitive Design, and to working closely with the public to ensure their involvement in the bridge type selection and to develop alternatives that reflected the character of the community and the surrounding environments.

The project moved into a 24-month design process upon the selection of the Final Bridge Types in December 2006.

Click here to read about the next step.

TRIMARC
Home  |  Project  |  Maps & Features  |  Historical & Environmental  |  Disadvantaged Business Enterprise  |  Right-of-Way  |  Public Involvement  |  Project Newsroom  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map